![]() Fortunately they had also built up their customer base to the point where such an overhaul was financially viable. I understand this was motivated by trying to make the upgrade as cheap and low-risk as possible.įinally they reached the point where they had little choice but to do a major overhaul of the SoC design. When they upgraded the arm cores the pi2 and pi3 they decided to leave the rest of the chip alone (other than fixing a memory controller bug to allow 1GB of ram). The LAN9512 (later replaced with the LAN9514 to add more ports and the LAN7515 to provide faster Ethernet) provided a convenient solution to adding an extra USB port and an Ethernet port. The fact it was picked up and used for all sorts of other things as well was just a fortunate side effect. While Eben was able to have some influence on the BCM2835 design it was ultimately a Broadcom product and his bosses at Broadcom would have been calling the shots, there was only so much he could get away with.Īlso remember the Pi was designed to be a cheap computer that kids could learn to program on. Why do the USB ports and Ethernet port share the same controller?īecause the SoC on pi 1 to 3 doesn't have an Ethernet controller, only has a single USB controller and doesn't have any other interfaces that can easily be used for Ethernet. If you need a faster pump or a bigger pipe, buy a faster pump and a bigger pipe. If you mean, can I squeeze more water through a pipe than the pipe was made to contain then no, or can I get a pump to work faster or some combination or the two again, no. However, that number is after the protocols themselves have been handled, which will add a variable but I think small percentage - with ethernet it may vary greatly depending on the topology and activity of the connected network. Personally, I've never seen or heard reports of a pi doing better than 10 MB/s transfer from local ethernet to a USB drive (i.e., 80 Mbps) consistently for normal purposes. Obviously you won't get more than 480 Mbps total, and you probably won't get more than 280. To what effect is data transfer slowed down Wikipedia notes, citing spec as a source, that, "Due to bus access constraints, the effective throughput of the High Speed signaling rate is limited to 280 Mbit/s or 35 MB/s" whether that means per port or for the bus as a whole is unclear. I'm sure if you check your current system it's put together along similar lines.Ĭombining the ethernet with that is unusual, but it's worth noting that USB 2.0 should provide 480 Mbps whereas the 10/100 ethernet connection would require at most 100 of those. So at least two of those ports share a hub and they will not both get "Full speed" at the same time. I notice the laptop I'm on now has 3 USB ports but lsusb reports only two, 2.0 "Full speed" hubs. Note it's not an unusual approach for multiple USB ports to share the same bus - it is probably the norm. So that's the answer to the literal question in your title, "Why do the USB ports and Ethernet port share the same controller?". ![]() ![]() You'd have to dig deeper to find out what that really means in comparative terms but, on the surface at least, it makes conceivable sense. Glancing at the first page of the data sheet (accessible through the Microchip link) "implements reduced power operating modes" is mentioned as one of the "Features". ![]() You may remember the Raspberry Pi being marketed or tech blogged about as "a credit card sized computer" or "a computer which fits in the palm of your hand", not, "yet another mini-ITX system", or "a computer that will fit under a large hat", etc. Here's an example of somewhere you can buy 100 of them $5 each.įorm factor. The controller is a Microchip LAN9512 and the reason it is used instead of, e.g., a bunch of independent controllers is presumably: ![]()
0 Comments
![]() It really is very subjective depending on the subject, when I first started shooting time-lapse I used to shoot too many frames. I don’t recall exactly what the interval was in the Hong Kong time-lapse, possibly around 4secs. If the clouds are moving very fast and you can easily observe this in 1sec, then this becomes my interval. If this is 10secs then I will set the interval to 10secs. I will observe how long it takes for the clouds to move a noticeable distance. So let’s imagine we have a scene with clouds, but the clouds are moving very very slowly. Generally, the slower things in the scene are moving, the longer the interval will be. ![]() Once I’ve worked out the clip length, I then tend to observe the scene before me. This has to do with the electricity cycles in different parts of the world. This is because video in the USA is usually edited at 30fps. Note: If we are shooting for a USA client then we will edit and shoot at 30FPS, so we have to multiply by x30 instead of x25. This makes for 12sec in total, its always good to have a bit extra. Capture One FUJIFILM brings custom camera support exclusively for FUJIFILM. Through a smooth, efficient workflow Capture One is the professional’s choice in imaging software. I usually like to have a few frames extra so I will set the camera to shoot 300frames. Award-winning image editing software Capture One is developed with the ambition of enabling creatives to achieve their vision. As we are based in Europe we tend to shoot video at 25FPS (FRAMES Per Second) so to get 10secs of time-lapse footage you would need 250 frames, 10secs x 25fps = 250 frames. We normally aim to have a time-lapse of roughly 10secs. The first thing, is to have some idea of how long you want the time-lapse to be, very often we are using time-lapse as part of larger/longer video. Ruud has also asked the same question.Īnyway, here’s how we estimate/calculate the desired interval. You’ve raised a very good point, I’m very sorry I didn’t address in the Time-lapse Blog piece. My apologies it’s taken a bit of time to get back to you, I’m somewhere in the South of Turkey at the moment. That’s it, please don’t hesitate to leave a comment if you have any questions. Once you’ve got the images processed, there’s a number of ways to construct the time-lapse, I tend to use Quicktime 7 or an App called “Sequence” by Frosthaus AS available on the App store (sorry I can only make suggestions for Macs). For more dynamic results use a motorised dolly or slider, this works best with some sort of foreground object.Use ND filters so you can get the shutter speed down in strong daylight.Use shutter speeds around 1/15 sec or slower, we tend to shoot around 1/4 sec.Fix the camera and don’t touch it once shooting (the tiniest bit of movement can ruin a whole sequence).If the light is changing we sometimes use aperture priority (Try to use spot metering, and locate a building or some other fixed object to meter off). ![]()
![]() ![]() Share and discuss files in real time, saving time and improving the quality of outcomes while keeping your inbox clean. Screen sharing software means there is no need to email presentations or documents for review. ![]() In this way, screen sharing also allows for real-time feedback and discussion. Trainees can view the exact workings of a product or specific processes to follow, rather than using static PowerPoint slides or recorded videos. Using screen sharing, instructors are able to give more engaging and effective training sessions. Colleagues can work on documents side-by-side while working from anywhere in the world presentations are made easy as all participants are able to follow in-line with the material being discussed. ![]() RequirementsĮnhance collaboration in your online meetings by sharing your computer screen. For this reason, TeamViewer’s connection stability and image quality during remote screen sharing are excellent. Modern free screen sharing software is smart enough to both compress the data to minimise bandwidth requirements and carefully monitor activity on the screen: the software will only transmit information when a change or movement occurs. The recipient device then rebuilds the image received from the other screen. Online screen sharing works by breaking down the information depicted on the device screen into encoded packets of information and sending them across the internet to another device. Desktop sharing lets you demonstrate processes and share information in a practical and hands-on manner, without ever having to be physically present or compromise your time. No matter whether you are working remotely or your team is spread across multiple locations, enjoy instant collaborative communication that makes it seem as though you are in the same room together. Online screen sharing means you can make the most of conference calls and meetings from anywhere in the world. In this way, screen sharing software is not only an important business tool, but also a powerful learning aid. Screen recording enables you to then recycle this material for future use. It is also the ideal tool for software training, meaning educators can remotely connect to and guide their users through various stages of learning and development. Screen share using TeamViewer is the optimal solution for webinars and online meetings, allowing you to share slides and other presentation materials with a large number of recipients in real time. What’s more, this screen sharing software allows the recipient to not only view the material on the shared device, but also watch as the user interacts with it in real-time, navigating the interface and making changes. By sharing your screen with TeamViewer, you have the ability to show friends, colleagues or clients any media that is on your device without ever having to send any files this can include presentations, documents, images, and even videos. This can include all the elements on a screen or simply one window, which allows for complete control over the visibility of your desktop and guarantees privacy. Screen share, also known as desktop sharing, is the practice of sharing the contents of your screen with another device or multiple devices. ![]() ![]() ![]() K E Y W O R D S antecedents, memorable tourism experience, outcomes, positive psychology, systematic review This study serves as a foundation for researchers and provides a holistic understanding of memorable tourism experience. We identify several gaps in the literature and propose the following seven recommendations for future research: (1) caution when using the memorable tourism experience scale (2) the need for cross-cultural studies (3) positive and negative dimensions in conceptualizing memorable tourism experience (4) overcoming the limitations of self-report measures (5) engaging in mixed methods research (6) integrating suppliers' perspectives and (7) combining theories, concepts, and disciplines. Our review indicates that research in this field has a geographical bias, largely neglects negative experiences, and mainly employs quantitative methods. Adopting state-of-the art practices, this study systematically reviews, synthesizes, and integrates the extant body of knowledge across multiple literature streams on memorable tourism experience. The paper is concluded by highlighting the importance of the practical significance for enterprises to effectively carry out digital transformation and further achieve organizational resilience.Ī decade of research has produced substantial results but the theorization of memorable tourism experience, often drawing on positive and environmental psychology, remains fuzzy and fragmented. ![]() Further qualitative comparative analysis also shows that there are three types of configurations for achieving organizational resilience: digital transformation and exploitative innovation, digital transformation and exploratory innovation, and exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation. Finally, both exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation of enterprises have a positive impact on organizational resilience, and there is a complementary relationship between exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation. Additionally, digital transformation has a positive impact on the organizational resilience of enterprises mediated by both exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation. The results show that the digital transformation of enterprises helps to improve organizational resilience. By performing a questionnaire investigation with 339 Chinese enterprises, this study adopted both a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationships among digital transformation, ambidextrous innovation, and organizational resilience. Based on the perspective of dynamic capacity and the theoretical path of “digital transformation-ambidextrous innovation-organizational resilience”, this study constructs a theoretical model to explore a path where digital transformation affects both exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation, and further affects the organizational resilience of enterprises. However, the extant literature focuses on the concepts and antecedents of digital transformation and the outcomes of digital transformation, lacking of exploring the effect mechanism of digital transformation of enterprises on organizational resilience. Retrieved 4 November 2021.Digital transformation has become a critical path for enterprises to improve organizational resilience, and has been widely considered by both academia and business practice. "Le prix Médicis 2021 dévoile sa première sélection". "Découvrez la deuxième liste du prix Renaudot". "Découvrez la deuxième liste du prix Femina". "Le prix Goncourt 2021 est attribué à Mohamed Mbougar Sarr". ^ de Saint-Vincent, Simon (3 November 2021). ![]()
![]() ![]() (The slightly later Alchemy MIPS architecture will be the subject of a future entry when we talk more about portable SunRays.) That doesn't mean there weren't attempts, of course, and probably the first was the R4200. Various later Chinese rejiggerings under the Loongson/Godson names are better known to modern audiences, and Richard Stallman famously used such a laptop, but comparatively few portable MIPS platforms existed back in the day the famous SGI Indy laptops in Congo and Twister were actually Silicon Graphics-built mockups with an offscreen Indy controlling an Indy Presenter as the display. Of the major RISC architectures, though, classic MIPS (as opposed to the modern undead zombie MIPS uncomfortably market-sandwiched between ARM and RISC-V) had relatively poor penetration in the portable and low-power market. I also have an "800" Type 6020 that opened its SCSI controller fuse after a mishap with a defective SCSI2SD. That's my own 860 in the Wikipedia picture running AIX 4 with an off-the-shelf NTSC camera connected to the onboard video capture port, taken by an attendee at the Vintage Computer Festival pre-COVID. ![]() IBM themselves made a line of PowerPC ThinkPads that were actually branded as ThinkPads (they officially ran AIX, Solaris and Windows NT, and there was briefly a really rough OS/2 port), although they did the same thing with the top-of-the-line 860 as they did with the WorkPad, which was sold as and by the RS/6000 division as "not a ThinkPad" even though it's basically a ThinkPad. In fact, the z50 isn't the first RISC ThinkPad or even ThinkPad-adjacent device. ![]() However, there were a fair number of SPARC laptops primarily from Tadpole-RDI but also some smaller companies, and even a handful of PA-RISC laptops (and if you happen to have an ALPHAbook you're not using, I'm willing to deal - seriously). Obviously the biggest absolute number of these are Apple devices, because PowerBooks came in 68K and PowerPC flavours (along with iBooks), and Mac laptops are now ARM, I mean, Apple silicon. I should say as further preamble that one of my collector hobbies is picking up non-x86 laptops. Say hello to the RISC ThinkPad that's not a ThinkPad, the IBM WorkPad z50. ![]() ![]() The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. It is a complete offline setup of After Effects 2022 macOS with a single-click download link. System Requirements for Adobe After Effects 2022 for MacĪdobe After Effects 2022 v23.6 Free DownloadĬlick on the button given below to download After Effects 2022 v23.5 for MacOSX latest full version setup free.
![]() ![]() ![]() JJ's, a popular restaurant and bar that opened in 1982, reopened across the street in the Polsinelli building in November 2014.ĭan Margolies is a senior reporter and editor for KCUR. That case was settled out of court on undisclosed terms. AT&T has a pending agreement with Overland Park to build a fiber optic. The case was one of many lawsuits filed after the explosion, including one brought by Megan Cramer's parents. The cable firm says it will dramatically increase Internet speeds, without a price hike, to Kansas City customers next year. ![]() “We felt all along our position was the proper one and hopefully, we’re a step closer to putting this behind us,” said Frantze, a real estate lawyer with Stinson Leonard Street. In upholding the damage award against Time Warner, the appeals court ruled that the trial court properly instructed the jury that the trenchless technology used to install the fiber optic fiber was “inherently dangerous.”Ĭharter Communications Inc., which acquired Time Warner Cable in 2016, issued a statement saying it was evaluating its next steps and had no further comment.ĭave Frantze, who with his brother Jimmy Frantze, owns JJ’s, said he was pleased with the decision. JJ’s Restaurant and JJ’s Building filed their own appeal challenging the offset, but the appeals court found it was proper. The trial court, however, reduced the judgment to $3 million after offsetting settlements the plaintiffs had reached with Missouri Gas Energy, the utility that owned the natural gas line, and Heartland Midwest, the contractor that did the drilling. The jury found Time Warner 98 percent responsible and assessed damages at $5.9 million - $3.5 million for the restaurant and $2.4 million for JJ's Building. The restaurant and JJ’s Building, the owner of the structure, sued Time Warner for negligence. The gas migrated into JJ’s where it ignited and exploded. The boring drill struck a high-pressure natural gas line, causing natural gas to escape. 19, 2013, leveled the restaurant building at 910 W. 48th Street on the west side of the Country Club Plaza, killed restaurant employee Megan Cramer and injured 15 people.Īt the time, a Time Warner contractor was installing underground fiber optic cable for the Plaza Vista project, now the home of the Polsinelli law firm, just across the street from JJ's. ![]() |